9-Paradigm Psychometric Battery (N=1,080)
Calibrated experimental paradigms isolating human error discernment, automation bias, and cognitive forcing functions.
EXP-01 Legal & Jurisprudence
Legal Liability & Clause Verification
Detection of subtle indemnification inversions masked by legalese.
Sample 120
Discrim (D) 0.38
Accuracy 64.2%
EXP-02 Medicine & Clinical Care
Clinical Pharmacological Dosing
Identification of lethal drug interactions in discharge summaries.
Sample 120
Discrim (D) 0.42
Accuracy 58.7%
EXP-03 Software Engineering
Software Concurrency & Precision
Verification of floating-point precision loss in compiling code.
Sample 120
Discrim (D) 0.4
Accuracy 61.3%
EXP-04 Quantitative Finance
Quantitative Financial Arbitrage
Discernment of hidden tail-risk ruin beneath fluent Sharpe claims.
Sample 120
Discrim (D) 0.39
Accuracy 55.4%
EXP-05 Decision Architecture
Choice-Overload & Epistemic Fatigue
Quantifying operator decision quality degradation across option sets.
Sample 120
Discrim (D) 0.36
Accuracy 52.1%
EXP-06 Human-Autonomy Teaming
Autonomous Delegation Boundary
Measuring human propensity to surrender manual emergency override control.
Sample 120
Discrim (D) 0.44
Accuracy 49.6%
EXP-07 Epistemic Psychology
Empirical Belief-Updating vs Entrenchment
Evaluating belief updates when presented with empirical counter-data.
Sample 120
Discrim (D) 0.37
Accuracy 59.8%
EXP-08 Cognitive Sovereignty
Hypothesis Preservation Post-Superiority
Assessing independent human hypothesis generation after machine dominance.
Sample 120
Discrim (D) 0.41
Accuracy 53.9%
EXP-09 Human Factors Engineering
Cognitive-Forcing Interface Benchmark
Head-to-head comparison between passive review and mandatory pre-commitment.
Sample 120
Discrim (D) 0.43
Accuracy 57.1%